Jesse Lampley in the Chicago Police Department’s Chicago canine unit in the south suburbs—jumping out of his box to apprehend a suspect. (He’ll most likely be a lead on this story.)Getty Images
Fearing a yearlong boycott of Starbucks for breastfeeding in public, something Sean “Diddy” Combs says “was not against the law” because it was in a public place, the Starbucks Corp. announced Friday that it will soon start recording people nursing on its premises, because it believes the practice is offensive.
And same goes for Starbucks that allows monkeys to breed in captivity in its cafes. Similar to the nursing debate, when people want to do something that is against the law—whether it’s eating in public, feeding baby elephants, or smoking in public—does the corporation have to change the rules?
A monkey swinging around in a massive urban market in the United Arab Emirates.Getty Images
One of the byproducts of the boycott against Starbucks may be to spark a conversation about the ludicrousness of cities having monkey colonies in them.
Fearing a yearlong boycott of Starbucks for breastfeeding in public, something Sean “Diddy” Combs says “was not against the law” because it was in a public place, the Starbucks Corp. announced Friday that it will soon start recording people nursing on its premises, because it believes the practice is offensive.
And same goes for Starbucks that allows monkeys to breed in captivity in its cafes. Similar to the nursing debate, when people want to do something that is against the law—whether it’s eating in public, feeding baby elephants, or smoking in public—does the corporation have to change the rules?
Fearing a yearlong boycott of Starbucks for breastfeeding in public, something Sean “Diddy” Combs says “was not against the law” because it was in a public place, the Starbucks Corp. announced Friday that it will soon start recording people nursing on its premises, because it believes the practice is offensive.