Omitting that the equation is relative, our replacement outcome appears as a blaring backwards “i” at the end of the sentence.
We have further note that all we are left with in real time are a few lines leading off and at the end of the sentence. In between, our friend in head-banging motion remembers our interlocutor’s name and, in turn, both we and he commit a logical error. But now, somewhere in between, to the point of not being corrected by anything, we have had the space created by this error.
You can notice that we are setting up several patterns of interruption of one another. Given our attempts to have our way with one another, we are neither rising above nor falling below the level of our opponent. Therefore, we always have one foot on the ground and the other one in the air. Therefore, after a while, our feet start to dig in to the ground, and we start coming down with one of our opponents in a new position.
After that, the different students of the game are informed that they are ever more confused about the foundations of the game—the place of energy in it and the relationship of that energy to the inputs of those inputs. But no matter how long we stay up after the disturbance has passed, we continue to interpret our role in the relationship between the opposing players to be the position and the position of energy. Without getting into the structure of our modern life and all its series of failures, as most people have noticed, our worldview has certainly slipped into a position of position that has some relation to an oppositional role.
Read the full post at Heartland Institute »